United Kingdom
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
view the rest of the comments
They are following the law. That’s what they are there for.
Upholding a corrupt law is not following the law.
https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption/2025/08/08/why-it-matters-whether-palestine-action-are-really-terrorists/
We can see clearly that these laws are not being applied to terrorists and instead being applied to anti-corruption organizations. This is an obvious perversion of the 2000 law. To use the law in this way is not only dishonest and morally corrupt, but it also infringes on the very foundation of democracy.
The only way you could rationalize using this law in this way is if you were defending a genocide which is exactly what is happening. I am not sure if you are actually an advocate of genocide, but by declaring it is lawful it shows that you are.
A simplistic argument to be sure. In that linked article however,
Therefore, following the law, proscription is lawful. It’s not the courts’ place to legislate. The fault is with MPs not judges.