this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
387 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

85461 readers
4408 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Under-16s will be banned from using social media, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced.

Starmer says social media is making children unhappy, making it easier for bullies to abuse children, and is "designed to be addictive". A ban would give children more time, security, and more freedom to grow up - as well as more opportunities, he adds.

"That is all any parent wants. They want to know that Britain will be better for their children, that they will get a fair chance," the PM says in a speech in Downing Street.

Starmer adds that the government is "not prepared to compromise" on the safety and happiness of children - and that includes in the regulation and enforcement of this ban. He says the government has listened to and learned from countries like Australia, where a similar ban has already been introduced.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] nuggsy@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This is my biggest issue with it.

Social media has become a blight on society on all levels. Not just children.

But, there's a lack of education or push for children, and adults too, to be smarter online. They're just instituting laws and legislation and pushing the onus on corporations to comply.

Sounds good at face value but doesn't factor in smaller companies who are unable to afford the changes needed to comply (resulting in the pulling out of a region) or they institute dodgey 3rd party verification systems that will just on-sell your data.

Then, there's the world of dodgey VPNs that kids and people have rushed to. Also, as other people have said, children have found work arounds for age verification.

So, what's the point? What did we actually achieve? I sometimes defer to the old addage of never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity. Sometimes I feel it's more like naievity or good intenaions being controlled by malicious forces.

I don't know.

What I feel though is that it just doesn't feel like it's truly about the children. If it is, there should be a whole lot more factored into this.

Instead it feels like a half baked plan being sold to us as being for the children.

[โ€“] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's a moral panic being co-opted by those in power. (Ironically, many of those in power being predators themselves, especially here in the US where they're a major political party ๐Ÿ™ƒ)

Some I can think of off the top of my head:

  • The Patriot Act
  • COINTELPRO
  • The Satanic Panic and resultant legislation
  • The War on Drugs

Legitimate concern gets amplified to a moral panic and then legislation is quickly put forth but is never tested or thoroughly understood. And given that most legislation today is written by lobbyists...well ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

I'm sure stupidity is a part of it, but that might be a bit too convenient. It's usually some genuine intention that then gets swept up and captured by malicious infrastructure. They know what they're doing. They're narcissists, unempathetic, and the most willing to exploit. Capitalism in a nutshell.

That's why I'm saying hold the parents and the corporations accountable. Peel back data collection and restrict algorithmic content altogether. Enforce/provide parental education for online technologies and children. Basically, pay attention to your kids, be interested in them and their lives. The infrastructure exists on these social media platforms to restrict and monitor access, as well as it exists at the router level and at the device level as well. It's the parents who purchase the device and provide internet access. Would we be ok with in home governmental inspections on all of us so that kids can't have access to a gun or alcohol? No, it's up to the parent to protect their child from danger. Why is this any different? Why should we all give up our privacy?