this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
179 points (98.9% liked)

World News

56645 readers
2429 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sweden's parliament passed a law on Monday allowing authorities to revoke immigrants' residency permits based on bad behaviour, ​such as having unpaid debts, doing undeclared work or ‌links to extremist organisations.

The law, which covers pending permits but also retroactively already granted permits, is part of a wider tightening of immigration ​rules by the right-wing government and its support party, ​the nationalist Sweden Democrats, ahead of a parliamentary election ⁠in September.

The law has been criticised by the opposition and ​human rights advocacy groups as arbitrary because decisions would be taken ​on behaviour that has not been deemed criminal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The law does ​not specify what ​types of behaviours ⁠are deemed unacceptable but the government has mentioned unpaid debts, not paying taxes, criminality and ​links to extremist organisations. 

[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Definitions of "criminality" and "extremist organizations" subject to change without notice, of course.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 5 days ago

According to my state's written down rules, there's a void for vagueness doctrine that's written down. In practice, though...ay yi yi

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ah, then it's definitely a bad law. (I'm on a limited connection and loading pages is very slow, so I hadn't read the article.)

I'd really appreciate it if articles made a point of actually linking to the damn law, but in this case I guess it would be in Swedish.

[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah they should link to it anyway!

And yes, this is a bad law. Rushed in a few months before an election by a right-wing coalition including the fascist SD. Things went badly so now they're throwing scraps to the frothing racists in their base in a desperate attempt to maintain power. They don't care if it's a good law, it's chum for dumbasses.