this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
429 points (98.2% liked)

me_irl

7911 readers
2227 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Single bedroom house that is supposed to be a lot cheaper than the "family homes," that would be in the same area. A 2 BR home may qualify as well. The issue is that they haven't built any of these type of houses in over 60 years, and the prices are jacked sky high.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Think it was a rhetorical question, that $800k figure is crazy even by modern standards for a "starter" home.

In my state, $800k is 3,000 square foot, 4 bedrooms, rooftop balcony, in the capital downtown.

$400k gets you about the same, just like 5 miles from that downtown with more yard.

$200k gets you a thousand square foot townhouse built in 2004...

$75k gets you a thousand square foot mobile home built in 2020 on the outskirts of the capital...

[–] arschflugkoerper@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No that was a genuine question, I don’t think I‘ve ever heard that term before.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 2 points 4 hours ago

In this particular case a starter home is specifically an average of the bottom third of the housing market. Zillow recently reported that, using that as the metric, 242 American cities now have starter homes costing one million dollars.

The nationwide average for a starter home is about $200k, which is still a lot, but not the huge figure that's been making the news this week.