this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
182 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

85539 readers
3569 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

I think it's a network problem. Most people use Chrome, therefore most people's friends and co-workers use Chrome, so there's a strong incentive to go with the pack. Google is obviously exploiting this to get their ecosystem claws in deeper, but I think the main thing is that Google effectively dethroned Microsoft as the default, and Mozilla has just kind of "been around" the whole time as the weird alt browser that the IT guy uses, even being propped up by Google in exchange for Firefox users' search data.

What should Mozilla do? IDK. I don't think "more AI" is the right answer, but I also don't know what I would do in their position. It's a tight spot.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I don’t think “more AI” is the right answer, but I also don’t know what I would do in their position.

Yeah.

I think “nontoxic” machine learning features are nice. You know, oldschool stuff. Firefox’s auto translation, as an example, is really cool, (AFAIK) completely local, and way better than Chrome’s equivalent.

But they poisoned that well with the yet-another-stupid-chatbot thing.

I dunno what Mozilla was thinking. It was so shitty. And now there will be a negative reaction to anything even ML-adjacent, even if it isn’t enshittified.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Personally I use the chatbot side panel once in a while, it doesn't get too much in the way while doing something else.

But all the other features using a small trained model are legit nice (translation, image captioning) and thankfully all optional.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I mean, I’ve been messing with LLMs before Llama 1. I don’t hate chat bots in general. But I found the sidebar kind of stupid. It didn’t feel like a smart model when I tried, it didn’t have knobs to tune, and literally everything has a chatbot anyway.

There are cool Firefox forks built as “agenic browsers” to interact with LLMs in a structured way. But I think they should be just that: separate. A different program to open when you want an LLM messing with your browsing, with all the security hazards that entails.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah it is. My friends think I'm 90 years old because I use "that old 90s browser, what a weirdo!"

I actually doubt the majority of people nowadays know what a browser is and how it differs from the OS or other applications