thinkercharmercoderfarmer

That's nice. You probably don't even need to read the article in that case, I think it's more geared toward people who want to do a little bit to help protect the climate in the situation they find themselves in regardless of personal financial incentives.

His performance on the late show was pretty solid too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWb3vCfK_jI

I don't get it :/

I see what you mean. In my experience of the internet it's called "The Streisand Effect" only when the person complaining about something (and therefore giving an issue attention that it otherwise wouldn't have received) is generally considered to be "in the wrong" on the issue. I can't think of a case where someone received blowback for speaking up about an issue (professional repercussions, exclusion from social circles, "cancelling" by various parties, w/e) but was considered to be in the right by the the people calling it "The Streisand Effect". It feels like there's a necessary component of "you complained about something you shouldn't have and were justly punished for it" schadenfreude attached to the term that differentiates it: if you don't have that you're just bravely and correctly shining a light on an injustice and it's not called "The Streisand Effect", it's just raising awareness or something.

I think you're being downvoted because the victim of the alleged injustice complaining about that injustice and then deserving the backlash is baked into the term, and calling it "victim blaming" feels off, but it technically is, it's just that calling something "The Streisand Effect" implies that the "victim" in the situation deserved what they got because they complained about something trivial, or an effect of privilege, or some other thing that, in the eyes of the public, makes them unworthy of sympathy. But I think carrying that implication of guilt means that it is, technically, victim blaming, and the person using the term "The Streisand Effect" implicitly agrees that the victim deserves blame for their actions. And knowing the internet, I doubt this assessment is correct 100% of the time.

I'm curious to see if other people agree with this assessment. I haven't done any research on whether my experience of the term is shared by other people, so this may not be a strong theory. Just a thought that spawned off your comment. But it is an interesting perspective.

I know we're doing hot takes but seriously please no more barriers to education that filter out people who had the misfortune of going to shitty schools. We gotta find some other way to help people where they are without impeding people who are more advanced; just kicking them out is a good way to entrench poverty.

It's not bad, I'm going to finish the first book and will probably pick up the next one. Part of the charm is looking back at an era where ripping off Tolkien wasn't such a cliche that that people actively avoided it. Brooks is far from the only person to do it so I'm not trying to be too hard on him, and it's different enough that I'm still invested. My only real complaint about the writing is how he keeps reminding us of how the fate of the world hangs in the balance. Like, yeah, we know, Allanon laid out the stakes very clearly in the opening lore dump. Show, don't tell. Overall I'm glad I picked it up.

EDIT: Also Walker Boh hasn't shown up yet so I'm gonna at least try to get to them.

Ok I'm about halfway through The Sword of Shannara and I'm enjoying it but it really feels like we're just doing The Fellowship of the ~~Ring~~ Magic Sword. They just got through the halls of the dead (which they had to take, even though they're guarded by the dead and are super dangerous but it's the fastest route) and I 100% expected ~~Gandalf~~ Allanon to die fighting the ~~Balrog~~ lake tentacle monster. But they get out, and Shae gets washed away by the river, and now Allanon's like "welp, the one guy who could wield the Magic Sword against the Evil Sorcerer, the guy this whole quest is about, might be dead now. He might not be, but let's abandon him and go find the Magic Sword anyway". I mean the author has explicitly stated that Allanon might have other plans up his sleeve but I really don't understand why finding Shae isn't priority #1.

Not at all falling in love with a classic series of fantasy novels and then feeling alienated by a modern cinematic adaptation written for a younger audience and a different time that I nevertheless feel should exactly reproduce my experience of the original and therefore am invariably disappointed is one of my favorite things, I do it all the time. Already got the first audiobook downloaded, looking forward to it.

If I had a nickel for every time I did that...

I'd have eight nickels!

I see it, maybe a little more post-industrial. But if you'd told me these were stills from Rings of Power (especially the last one) I would have accepted it without question.

Also, how have I missed out on Shannara? It looks amazing, glad you mentioned it ❤️

"The Lord of the Rings" is a multimedia fantasy virus isn't it. Just gets into everything.

Messed up teeth can wreak havoc on your health, they just make you constantly sick all the time. It sucks. If I ever get my teeth fixed and it involves removing a bunch of them I probably won't go this route, but I kinda get it. The dental equivalent of mounting your nemesis' head on a pike.