this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
554 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

85600 readers
3784 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abc@suppo.fi 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Both Tesla and SpaceX has produced a lot of stuff, some of it pretty good. But yeah, their stock price are bit out there.

[–] Jako302@feddit.org 12 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

90% of SpaceXs assets are in AI Datacenters that are running grok, I wouldn't call that any good stuff, even in terms of AI. Apart from that they grifted a lot of money from the US government to produce rockets that are worse than what NASA could have delivered with the money.

The only "good" thing spaceX made is Starlink, which has about 12 million subscribers and brings in a revenue of 11 billion each year, with about 4 billion in profits. That's nothing compared to big network companies.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Wow, no. Look at what nasa is producing with Artemis. Business as usual is $2B/launch, way over budget, and years behind schedule. There is no path to launch more than 1-2/year and they depend on reusing old components with very limited supply.

In contrast Falcon 9 cost nasa less than one Artemis launch has an unmatched record of reliability, drastically reduced launch costs, made reusability practical, and has earned its place launching 80% (by mass) of the world’s payload to orbit. Nothing matches its record

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I don't know why you're being downvoted, but you're right. SpaceX made a lot of advancements on its rockets and in lowering the price per launch.

This is objective. This isn't sentimental or arguable.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Stock prices shouldn't be volatile based on tweets lol

[–] abc@suppo.fi 0 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

because people's future (and even present) financial safety depends on it. the stock market is used for dead serious things, its not supposed to be a meme market.

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

(gestures at headline)