this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

United Kingdom

6748 readers
346 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No I 100% agree with you. I think unlike previous prime ministers he was a good person and wanted to fix things. But he let himself be led astray by the right of the party, and trying to appeal to reform voters.

I was extremely disappointed when he started going on about small boats, letting the right set the narrative. After that it was just a bunch of misfires and miscommunications, like the whole thing to do with farmers now paying some inheritance tax, that was communicated very poorly and when the right decided to try and make a thing of it Starman never provided any pushback, that was a show of great weakness and should not have happened.

His time in office was exemplified by piss poor public relations, and various policies that didn't seem like they've been thoroughly thought out.

Oh, that whole farmer business. I won't say I understood the policy enough to say if it was good policy or not, but from afar the vibes were 'don't do anything that annoys Car-guy Clarkson'.


His time in office was exemplified by piss poor public relations, and various policies that didn't seem like they've been thoroughly thought out.

Hmm, yes. That worries me though. Like will a drop in, like Andy Burnham, have good policy ready to go? Hopefully so.

Even if he does have good policy coming in, and with Starmer falling on his sword, any new PM won't have a great deal of political cache. Institutions like Treasury might well find it easier to push back against a new direction from No.10.

Anyway, its done, the wheels are in motion. Can only hope for better things to come.