PC Gaming

14892 readers

431 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

328

Data analyst finds 'AI stigma' on Steam can reduce the number of reviews a game gets by around 53%—and the reviews it does get are more negative (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 day ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

86 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago

I think the way you phrased it misses the point. It simply does not matter whether AI "art" is good or bad, in a technical sense.

Until AI is an actual person, and can make art reflecting its subjective experience (which would no doubt be very interesting) ; AI "art" is just nothing.

There is no meaning, no story behind it, no other mind to connect with. It was made by a philosophical zombie, a thing that possesses enough appearance of consciousness to seem aware, but no actual subjectivity.

AI "art" could be technically irreproachable, ie "good" and it would still be equivalent to nothing. Even a blank canvas made by a human means worlds more than our current AI could ever make.

And I personally don't believe AI will ever be a person. But on that, sensible minds may differ.