this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

4722 readers
226 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I made an extension that bypasses online age verification

To show my stance towards online age verification, I made a small (literally, less than 10 kilobytes) add-on that will completely skip ageverif.net's verification prompt. (Only that site (for now?))

With more and more data breaches going on it's important to protect yourself by not sharing unnecessary data, and to show how broken some age verification platforms are!

It's #opensource too! https://github.com/helloyanis/agechecker.net-bypass (more info on why I do it is in the readme)

By Developer @helloyanis@furries.club

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] refalo@programming.dev -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's not documentation, you're intentionally twisting people's words to support a specific narrative that wasn't there in the first place.

[โ€“] cm0002@toast.ooo 1 points 4 days ago

Each link is

  • Supported by a screenshot
    • of the in-thread context
    • of the mod log entry
  • Contains links
    • To the thread for addl context (where possible)
    • To the modlog entry (where possible)
    • To any additional supporting context (e.g. an article explaining why [Y] source is misinformation)

Titles are appropriately interpretive, as is anything else in this world.

For example, how else would you interpret dessalines posting this in reply to someone

As something else as "If you don't support Russia then you just don't understand geopolitics"