this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
352 points (95.6% liked)

Selfhosted

60177 readers
559 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Based on recent comments this feels like a discussion we should have. So..topic, basically.

I'm not looking to be chief noisemaker on this, but I stand by what I wrote in !privacy and what's in my post history.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

Let's have at; do we want a [AI] and [NOT AI] tag. Why or why not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Therefore, you'll want to be able to sort by [Not AI]

No, I don't. I'd rather have no tags at all and some AI posts in there than every post needing annoying tags in the title. Also not every post is related to a specific piece of software

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh, I just noticed what community I was commenting in. Yes, you're completely right, then. It's more of a helpful little tag for those who are interested than a filter for different types of creators.

I'd assumed, obviously incorrectly and with the wrong context, that you were expressing anti-AI views, so I was trying to communicate how not fully standardizing (labeling) the data (posts) would affect you from your, once again, improperly assumed perspective.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 2 points 3 days ago

Oh, I hold anti AI views :-) Just not so fierce that I want to be warned of every mention