this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
41 points (91.8% liked)
Linux
66095 readers
283 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ah, okay. I do concede that -historically- Fedora wasn't robust, no. They weren't shy about breaking changes, which even led them to be referred to as Red Hat's test bed distro by the community and beyond.
However, for (at least) the last 5 years or so, Fedora's direction has changed significantly. I'm not entirely sure what prompted this change, but it has definitely been a welcome one. For example: most recently, Fedora has somewhat even formalized this new approach with their new initiative.
Basically, Fedora wants to be innovative like they've always been known for. But, this shouldn't come at the cost of alienating your own user base. Thus, the proposal details how these two perspectives can see eye to eye with each other.
As for KDE Plasma; again -historically- it has been a second-class citizen on Fedora; at least, compared to GNOME. But, KDE Plasma has since been promoted. There's no meaningful difference between the two variants when it comes to how Fedora regards them. Even the website alludes to this:
Thanks for the additional context. I may have misunderstood the announcement 5 years ago as I remember reacting very negatively to that news. Are they still defaulting to flatpak for new apps?
Sorry, perhaps I should have been clearer:
I didn't reference any 5 year old announcement. If you didn't imply that anyways, then please consider sharing the 5 year old announcement.
Did Fedora ever default to flatpak for new apps 🤔? For Fedora Atomic, sure. But I don't recall traditional Fedora ever doing so. This isn't Canonical that re-installs an .deb installation as a snap.
I got confused with CentOS changes in 2000: https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
It eroded my trust with anything Red Hat-related. And the acquisition by IBM in 2019 had already damaged its image.
Last time I tried Fedora (around last year), anything installed via the "software" app in GNOME defaulted to a flatpak install.
This became a lot longer of a writing than I expected. My apologies*. So, without further ado.
Ah okay. Thanks for clarifying! I remember that the pushback was real on that one. But, I'm not sure if it was justified. If anything, I'd say that people had a knee-jerk reaction to it and it soon after became a 'toxic' environment in which reasonable discourse was (almost) non-existent.
However, Gordon Messmer^[Yeah, yeah; he works at Red Hat, so you might be rightfully skeptical whether he can even be unbiased. However, he has build so much good will through his community efforts that I'm absolutely giving him the benefit of doubt. Though, please feel free to disagree with me on this.]'s piece on this suggests that CentOS was everything but what was idealized by the community. As such, being converted to CentOS Stream might have been a positive change.
Anyhow, honestly, I'm not well-versed with RHEL(-clones). So feel free to dismiss anything I've said 😜.
Moving on... What's perhaps important to note is that Fedora's relation to Red Hat is a curious one. For example, Fedora defaults to Btrfs for its file system while Red Hat has deprecated it for quite a while now. Furthermore, while Red Hat seems to go pretty hard on Image Mode, Fedora didn't even block a major update (until very recently) if some bug impacted its atomic variants very negatively. So, basically, Red Hat's priorities =/= Fedora's priorities.
But, having said all of that, I do respect your choice to not trust anything Red Hat-related. Perhaps, I would have done so as well, were it not for the fact that I've been daily driving Fedora(-derivatives) for quite a while. Yes, I admit that I'm probably biased 😅.
Interesting. I literally did a fresh Fedora install within a VM and the results have been interesting:
.rpminstall by default. Examples include Steam and GNOME builder..rpmpackage is not picked up, then it does default to flatpak. And it's not possible to select the.rpmpackage within the GUI either. Even thoughsudo dnf install <package name>does work as you'd expect 😅. Examples include Neovim.I wonder if you had to deal with the above shenanigans last year as well. Or, perhaps, it was even worse for some awful reason. Anyhow, there's more truth to it than I expected. Though, I'd argue it's probably some bug or otherwise unintended behavior.
If you've read all of my ramblings, then I'd like to thank you for the effort 😊! Have a good one, fam!
I did read everything and I appreciate your writing! I might give Fedora another try at some point but I've stopped distro-hopping for a while now. Manjaro on my laptop for 7 years, Debian on servers, I'm a happy man.
Thank you so much! I appreciate it 😊!
It's a big honour that you're even reconsidering your stance on Fedora. Thank you! But, honestly 😜, I wasn't interested in proselytizing Fedora or anything. I wanted to better understand your stance and perhaps^[Which I did, so thank you 😊!] learn something in the process.
I'm glad to hear you are 😊. Have (another) good one, fam!