this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
812 points (96.6% liked)

People Twitter

10114 readers
1836 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

As examples (as "taking charge" can take multiple forms across mutiple goals): table and/or moderate meetings to come to consensus on goals, coordinate members for coordinated actions toward social goals, source funding for operations if funds are needed, speak on behalf of your group (or coordinate group messaging) toward other groups. To name a few generic things. Specifics depend on what you want done.

To try and sum it up: "taking charge" is providing impetus, and potentially aligning community power, toward making headway to some social/political goal.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

English is not a language of domination and hierarchy you need to be careful to avoid expressing that.

You might say 'initiative' if you were being careful and conscious.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know what exactly you mean by "English is not a language of domination and hierarchy" or how that really relates to what I was saying or what I originally asked you. "Taking charge" is a extremely common idiom in English.

I will concede that "take initiative" is a more neutral phrase, but you have turned to nitpicking my diction, even after I spent another full comment explicating the meaning and intention of the original question.

So it is my turn to ask what you mean by sidestepping my question? If you are uninterested in answering the question, just say so. I have done with someone else in this very post. But don't think you can confuse me with literary legerdemain. You don't answer questions by saying "you could've phrased it better."

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Sorry was originally writing that sarcastic because I assume nobody is literate and I should at least be having fun.

If I completely rewrite what you asked and assume the best, sure in some cases. Its not exactly what I want, but close enough. But you didn't actually write what I'm responding to here, so...