qarbone

Duke Poop'em is heinous lol

In the middle of their march, if you could.

I mean, at this point we're just doing theorycrafting for human monsters, but that concept just doesn't resonate with me.

That concept is the "I have any itch I just can't scratch" type of depraved, where it's a compulsion. They need just another type of stimulus because they've done it all, and they fell into child rape.

But what I see from them, and the little evidence we're allowed to hear, shows more of a laidback, nihilistic type of depravity. They have more money than they'll ever need, but why shouldn't they get a little more money by suppressing some poor-people's rights? Why shouldn't they buy that car, yacht, election, sex slave?

I imagine they look at Hunter Biden's vices the same way we look at the Amish: "why are you limiting yourself to that when it's so easy to get more?"

No, I think they know they're into the most depraved shit. It was just the now-classic projection: condemnation for sexual affairs. You think they haven't done crack with adult Latinas before sinking to raping kids?

They're not the psychiatric definition of pedophiles, in the sense of mentally-ill people with anti-social paraphilias; they're depraved monsters who know raping kids is some of the most illicit things they had yet to dabble in. It's not sexual attraction to kids, it's the rush of power from being able to break a taboo and get away with it.

Beat him to death, with hammers.

This is the sort of pipedream, hyperspecific indie project I only want to learn about after the dev's been working on it for 14 years already, and it's only 6 more years until it finally releases.

Feel free to copy my response in a reply to them. And that doesn't change the contents of your own response, isolated in the exchange between you and the thread OP.

However, I'm not reading every comment, so I'll take my own advice and apologize if I caught you in your least charitable moment.

If you wanted them to explain their point more, why was the only thing in that comment a aggressively rhetorical appeal to no one based on your presumptions? Instead of articulating yourself that their point was unclear, you launched directly into an attack. Does the dissonance of that not...register with you?

You didn't even apologize for the unwarranted and unflattering mischaracterization of their message. You just acted like they were the one holding out from a civil conversation: "That's all I needed to hear."

Honestly, it's a vibe.

They were prompting you as if you were an LLM. You'd get pulled off task and expose yourself

Nah, that could easily have a landed as a joke instead of a brain fart. And being funny is about 80-90% as good as being physically attractive.

We have to disband this entire government.

Republicans are obviously doing crimes but the Democrats are complicit to these in spite of the inexcusably lazy defense of "decorum". You don't stand on decorum when criminals are killing people outside and shitting all over your floor.