United Kingdom

6769 readers

233 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

160

Judge throws out Andrew Tate’s legal claim to be told names of accusers (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 day ago by Veserr@sh.itjust.works to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lawyers for the Tates said the brothers had offered to be interviewed by Bedfordshire police in Romania and had undertaken to give up £20,000 each if they revealed the names of their accusers in the UK.

They didn't just try to get the names, they tried to bribe the police - with relative pocket change - for the names.