this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
775 points (98.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40515 readers
4201 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 95 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

I see the point, but I don't think intellectual elitism is the same as anti-anti-intellectualism. I think intellectual elitism creates a sense of alienation from science that in fact leads to anti-intellectualism. "I have more specialized knowledge than you" is not the same as "I'm better than you," and acknowledging that is the solution

[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

I see the point, but I don’t think intellectual elitism is the same as anti-anti-intellectualism. I think intellectual elitism creates a sense of alienation from science that in fact leads to anti-intellectualism.

That is just the inferiorily informed trying to justify their lack of knowledge by calling the people more knowledgeable than they are in that field "elitism".

In the modern day, They could EASILY educate themselves with the actual current and up to date scientific research, the internet exists.

The fact that they would rather "educate" themselves with populist YouTube bullshit videos that simply validate their incorrect beliefs instead of looking up the actual research papers that are 100% **ALSO available on the internet ** is entirely their fault and no one else's, you can't blame the fact that they won't read the research on "elitism"

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 38 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think they're joking about the elitism part. People just need to stop to listen to idiots

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

completely tangential, but this is actually an interesting grammatical point. I'm guessing you're German by your username; "stop to listen to idiots" would mean "aufhören, um Idioten zuzuhören." "aufhören Idioten zuzuhören" would be "stop listening to idiots." it's interesting because "to [verb]" and "[verb]ing" are often interchangeable, but in this case they actually mean the opposite

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Richtig, danke.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I understood absolutely zero of the German, but for other non native English speakers who didn't pick up on the issue here:

The usual phrase here would be "stop listening to idiots". The sentence that was used, "stop to listen to idiots" means the contrary, that you'll stop what you're doing so that you can listen to what the idiot has to say.

Which is a valid option, but an ill advised one.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago

For the non-Germans who want to know the source of the confusion: It's basically the same sentence structure in German meaning something different than in English.

to has distinct meanings in "I want to listen to them" and "you should stop to listen to them". In the first sentence, it's effectively an article for the activity "listen to them". In the second sentence, it implies an intent, which could be made explicit like "stop in order to listen to me".

English uses the progressive ("stop listening") to disambiguate with words like stop. German instead uses an additional preposition "um" for the intent meaning of to.

(In this case, the meaning difference between "interrupting something" and "stop for good" also has different words, "anhalten" and "aufhören").

Word for word, "Aufhören zuzuhören" would mean "stop to listen", but actually means "stop listening" while "stop to listen" would be correctly translated as "anhalten, um zuzuhören".

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The issue is that anti-intellectualists think that the very concept of knowing more than them about any given topic is elitism.

My conspiracy theorist mom would go on and on about how her spending an afternoon googling something put her ideas at a higher level than someone who got a degree studying it, and if I agreed with the person with the degree, then I was an idiot for not following her. She thought that right up until she died trying to treat her cancer with quack therapies.

Regardless of whether we frame it as "I'm better than you because I know more than you," the anti-intellectualists will still be framing it as "I'm better than you because my 'gut feeling' knows more than you." It's a competition to them, not because someone told them they were lesser, but because they already believed they were greater.

Well at least your anti vaccine mom is dead

There are way too many people like her who exist

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

They are better than them, at that thing, and if you don't defer, then they have every right to scoff at the stupidity before them.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

They want this same elitism. They want to have their own special secret knowledge only they (and a small handful of internet people “in the know”) have access to. This makes them feel special and superior.

[–] searabbit@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago

Humans feeling a need to impose a hierarchy where they sit at the very top is why we can't have nice things

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 3 points 10 hours ago

Well then they should just join a mystery cult or practice alchemy

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Right, but people will call nearly anything elitism these days. The reason schools don't offer accelerated learning programs for students who aren't challenged by the average coursework is because people were calling that type of thing elitist.

Instead, now we put the upper quartile in the same classes as the lower quartile so that nobody receives the particular level and kind of attention that they need, and everyone is held to "average" whether they're predisposed to be above that expectation or below it.

If someone is talented at a sport, people shower them with praise and give them full rides to college. If someone is talented at math or writing, people tell them to be a team player and stop surpassing their peers by so far. Merit-based scholarships are rare nowadays too, so good luck going to a top university just because you excel at your subjects...

[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

Merit-based scholarships are rare nowadays too, so good luck going to a top university just because you excel at your subjects…

At least that is not true.
'The rest of it is, highschools are an enforcer of conformity and woe be to anyone that bends the curve.

[–] searabbit@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Except these programs are literally known to be abused by the elite for their benefit. It's not elitist to want evidenced-based support for low income high achieving kids, and for that support not to be diverted to upper-middle class kids who don't need it.

Merit based and sports scholarships are well-known to be specifically designed to attract upper middle class kids because of the benefit they have of tutors, coaches, and extensive personalized guidance through their entire schooling. Actually this is the exact reason top universities prefer need-based financial aid; they don't need the extra money merit-based scholarships are known to bring. Low income kids tend to struggle navigating admissions systems and financial aid on their own in general, and these particular programs, especially the sports scholarships, don't make themselves very accessible to prospective applicants.

I haven't seen whatever studies have been done on accelerated learning programs, so I don't know if they help/hurt anyone conclusively, but I will say from personal experience being both included and excluded from them, I absolutely hated them from both angles. If you test into them, you're doing extra work and being segregated (with a target on your back for bullies) from your classmates. If you don't test into them, but you learn at a faster pace than the average, you're literally gatekept from the advanced material even if you want to learn it. I think what would do worlds of difference is bringing respect back to teaching by hiring more teachers and paying them more which would allow for more individualized learning, so each child gets their educational needs met without unnecessary segregation.

If you want to do further reading, there's a lot of very passionate people who have dedicated themselves to this topic for decades. This is a slightly outdated, but seemingly comprehensive report I just found online, section 5 is specifically on systemic admissions hurdles for low income kids: https://www.jkcf.org/research/true-merit-ensuring-our-brightest-students-have-access-to-our-best-colleges-and-universities/

[–] Fluke@feddit.uk 3 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago)

I was one of those "gifted children" according to every assessment I was subject to.

In my shitty crab bucket of an ex-mining town, "no child was left behind". Meaning, every "top set" class has two or three knuckle dragging cunts whose every waking thought appeared to be "How can I be as much of a disruptive prick as possible?"

This led to 90% of our lessons being taken up by the poor teacher having to basically babysit three animals intent on destroying equipment and furnishings while we taught ourselves.

These dickhead should have all been in a remedial class together, where they could be taught at a level they all understood, with a length of 2"x2" as far as I give a fuck.

Edit: Those of us that didn't give a shit about fucking football, or in fact were different in any way, shape, or form, had a huge bullseye already painted on us. Having the bullies in all of our classes just made it worse, there was no escape.