this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
149 points (97.5% liked)

Selfhosted

60177 readers
830 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
149
Selfhosted & AI (anarchist.nexus)
submitted 20 hours ago by curbstickle@anarchist.nexus to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Yup, I'm posting another this week. Sorry.

This week I'm hoping we can wrangle a solution around AI and our selfhosted community. There are plenty of strong opinions (both pro and con), but one thing is for certain - there needs to be better disclosure in promo posts. Two options (that aren't mutually exclusive):

  • Any posts of an AI focused, AI Developed, etc software gets an [AI] tag. No, a [Not-AI] tag is not needed to accomplish this, thats kind of a "non-golfer" sort of tag.
  • Comment requiring an AI disclosure response to every promo post, if its not detailed in the post itself. Specifics (generating docs for commands, translation, whole-boat vibe-coded this app, etc) would be requested.

I will say that having disclosure and/or tagging would mean that comments that just say "slop" or "fuck ai" or whatever would be off topic at that point, that information is already provided, so its just noise (and sometimes pretty uncivil - I've been light on that for now due to the need for a rule on this).

The tag [AI] would make it easy to filter out (or search for, if that's your thing), but there is a wildly different degree of AI use out there, and from the posts with a positive score, its usually due to responsible AI use (translations, a snippet they had to do something obscure with, available to use with AI but doesn't require it, whatever), which is why I think the disclosure has a place as a benefit to everyone.

Please provide any input or alternative options on this, and I can then put it to a vote like the last one. Comments seem to be the best approach without involving something off-site, but if you have a better idea/option, please share.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 22 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I want a community where people can use AI to help build a tool and be able to post about it here. But unfortunately, I’m just not seeing that. The AI-generated apps seem to be coupled to a drive-by, AI generated post (and comment replies) all full of em dashes and the standard Claude slop language.

So, yes, mandate an AI tag. Hold posters to it and remove violators, because it seems to always be the same class of “contributors” that are cosplaying as software developers.

Not sure if your rule changes are touching this, but the worst offenders I don’t want to see here are:

  • posting and commenting text written entirely by AI
  • not open sourcing or giving any visibility into their code
  • adopting a paid model

The people doing that remind me of the people who would approach me 20 years ago saying “hey I have an idea for an app I want you to build and I’ll give you 5% of my company. It’s like Facebook for dogs, but I need you to sign an NDA before I say any more”.

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

i agree with you. i have been working orofessionally as a software developer for over 27 years. i'll use ai to help research something but i cant atand low effort full ai projects being posted.

i always saw non devs using ai to fully generate something for them personally to fix a very custom need but why do these people post projects thry honestly had no hand in.

[–] halm@leminal.space -3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I want a community where people can use AI to help build a tool

Sure, that's github

and be able to post about it here

Fine, but others including myself want that slop as far away from here as possible. Maybe start another community? I suggest calling it c/vibehosted.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Fine, but others including myself want that slop as far away from here as possible

And there are people like me who are fine with moderate AI use and would rather judge the project themselves rather than have them rejected outright.

Maybe there should be a community poll

[–] halm@leminal.space 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Why a vote to switch up an existing community? The admins have proposed the [AI] tag to mitigate slop projects.

You said you wanted a community to post vibe coded projects, go ahead and set it up. I don't see why it needs to be foisted onto c/self hosted, unless you have some vested interest in boosting sloppy mcslopface projects.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago

I'm not sure I understand. First off I'm not the same person as GP. Second, the admins are proposing an AI tag, which I'm supportive of. I'm just saying that I am OK with AI-assisted projects being posted to this community (with the AI tag of course)

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The first bullet is, the other two are covered in the current rule 7 that just went live this week.

While part of promo, this is just about its own item here. In part because it could be something like "I wrote some of this script, got some ai help to talk to this closed device, here's what I'm using" which doesn't really fit promo, but still garners a lot of negative attention and comments.

I'm a bit hopeful this one would be of slightly broader benefit than just the straight up promo posts (which has a good amount of requirements now to filter out the garbage, though it does put some delays on f/loss projects that are well intentioned).

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

Just found the other rule post. Looks great!