this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
30 points (96.9% liked)

science

27765 readers
44 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm a single dad dealing with family courts and my ex has been denying custody for a month and the courts are slow as fuck and do Jack shit.

I get it.

but this is a study on mother's specifically. instead of complaining go do that study you want instead

[โ€“] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The thing that bugs me is how selective the study is. The amount of dads that were broken, took their life or were not far from it, and to pick one small study focussing on how mums were negatively affected by it is galling. It's like studies on the impact of police discrimination faced by white men. Contextually an insane and insulting use of academic funding.

It'll be used to further rebalance the courts further away from shared parenting and the child's right to access both parents which is a UN right and Scandinavia does far better. The experience for fathers is traumatic.

I don't envy you. Keep going, and even when things look bleak, keep going. Things can turn out positive, even against the odds and even with the most biased CAFCASS staff. Not sure it's relevant to you, but I've heard Both Parents Matter (formerly Family's Need Fathers) is an excellent charity for support and advice.

I will say, not everyone can do academic studies. Some don't have the qualifications, or lifestyle situation or credibility to do anything that would be any more than an online blog and with far less impact. It is more than fair for someone to comment on the studies shared. Isn't that what this community is about?