World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
This should be understood as a move to counter Turkey and perhaps coax Armenia closer to alignment with Israel.
There are two recently emerging factions in the vicinity. One has India, the UAE, Ethiopia, Greece, Israel and their dependents whereas the opposing block has Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt (which was originally with the UAE since they helped the military coup but flipped over Ethiopia and Gaza), Turkey, Qatar and their dependents. Both have also had elements opposed to the existing Iranian block although recently the group with Turkey and Pakistan and so on has been promoting peace with Iran and trying to make a ceasefire while Israel & the UAE want Trump on the ground there.
The faction Turkey is in generally wants to support Islamist leaning governments like the recognized governments of Sudan, Somalia, Syria and Yemen, at this point basically kind of a support of the status quo. Whereas the other faction has problems with governments like that and generally want to either flip the ideologies of those states to something less religious (ex. supporting Arab supremacist RSF over Islamist-leaning SAF in Sudan, or the UAE-backed military coup against the elected MB government in Egypt) or to split off smaller fragments from them by smaller nationalisms or sectarian issues (ex. backing the South Yemen separatists before Saudi Arabia rolled over them or Somaliland to become independent from Somalia).
If Armenia is drawn in then that would help Israel to contain Turkey somewhat since it would have Greece to the west, Armenia to the east and Israel to the south past the Turkish aligned government of Syria. That said it would be a rough road to swaying Armenia because Israel has previously heavily supported Azerbaijan since both countries were heavily against Iran, and Israel has not been treating the Armenian quarter of Jerusalem well. But, it does have good relations with other members of the faction such as buying a huge number of weapons from India and I think the UAE just cut a sweet economic deal with Armenia.
One thing I think will be interesting is how this develops with Azerbaijan and Iran. Obviously, Azerbaijan is cold on the matter of the Armenian genocide because some of the Armenians fleeing the genocide into Russian controlled lands organized militias that saw Azeris as the same as the Turks who killed them and began fighting with them. These militias quickly established on both sides began ethnic cleansing each other and started the ball rolling on ethnic polarization and converting previously mixed areas to monoethnic ones. Also Enver Pasha, a great villain of the Armenian Genocide, is actually seen way better in Azerbaijan than even Turkey because the Islamic Army of the Caucasaus that he established and his brother commanded rolled back the Dashnak and Bolshevik forces responsible for massacres against Azeris like the March Days up until they were forced to turn back when the Turkish capital at Istanbul got exposed and surrendered following Bulgaria’s capitulation. Even as they were leaving they armed local Muslim militias which put them on a better footing than they would have been, so such figures are regarded positively in Azerbaijan’s history although they are reviled elsewhere.
On between Iran and Azerbaijan, Azerbaijan has been very staunchly secular and heavy-handed in response to Iranian preaching in its country as Aliyev detailed in Wikileaks cables (he’s on the record in the Bush era as saying that the country “would end” if even a small number of more traditionally religious Azeris come as refugees from Iran as a reason for not wanting a hypothetical war against Iran to start) and since they both were hostile to Iran Azerbaijan bought many weapons from Israel while building up the military after it was soundly defeated in the first NK war. In the Wikileaks cables Aliyev was very suspicious of Erdogan and did not seem to have a good relation at all to start with because he considered him to be too religious. But it seems their partnership has grown far stronger since then. Something interesting recently was that despite the partnership with Israel, Azerbaijan seems to have only been struck by one missile from Iran, which Iran promptly claimed was actually not from them when Azerbaijan bristled at it. That’s nothing compared to the barrage fired at many of the other neighbors despite arguably having more justification. Perhaps a thaw is occurring between the two behind the scenes, maybe facilitated by Turkey and Pakistan’s roles in trying to secure a ceasefire. On the flip side, if Armenia becomes perceived as getting closer ties to Israel, that could be viewed as hostile to Iran if that happens which could possibly make their traditionally positive relations grow more cold.
A surprising web of politics can go into a simple recognition of history.
This should be understood as hypocrisy
Sure, I just thought it would be helpful to elaborate on the interests influencing the decision to do it now as opposed to previously.