this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
460 points (96.9% liked)

me_irl

7969 readers
693 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just looked that up because it seemed interesting. It was a fun little game where you have to choose out of two images. It was a lot harder though because it was out of context and photorealistic. I find it much harder personally to identify photo realism A.I. unless it makes some glaring mistakes. Mostly it kind of looks "too perfect". I ended up with 80% accuracy. I actually got more accurate when I got bored and chose within 2 seconds to get it over with lol, I was less accurate when I carefully zoomed in and took my time which was an interesting outcome. The cynical part of me wonders if the results of that game will be used to make even more convincing A.I.

Link

[โ€“] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That one is actually even better. The other one was in foreign language so i couldn't understand the explanations of why some pictures were AI.

Though it does have the same problem. There are only 2 options, so it's possible to get 50% right by just randomly choosing. I could probably guess 3/10 pictures because those had untypically blurry background, but eventually got 6/10 correct. Though the blurry effect can be achieved in photography as well. So it was just guessing and figuring out the pattern for those pictures.

Accuracy dropped to 45% if i continued.