this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
83 points (95.6% liked)

Reddit

23142 readers
122 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

... Meanwhile another comment in the thread was talking about someone swallowing Bibi's semen but I guess that's okay.

**UPDATE: I challenged the ban because it was just a pun and they lifted it. **

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are indeed the person disconnected from reality that that user is referencing.

Would Harris have been marginally better? Sure, especially if you're an American and have fully disconnected yourself from all foreign policy decisions.

Was she a good candidate considering the American electorate? No, she decided to be a Reagan era republican except even more racist and genocidal. We already had one of those running for the other side and those voters don't change their letter.

Did she run a good campaign considering the historicity of the "independent voter" as well as the history of right-wing voters in this country? Absolutely not. She did every single possible thing to show she was not at all a choice for anyone not right wing, and we already had a right-wing president running for office on the republican side. She also showed absolutely ridiculous ignorance in the state of the American public by praising Biden during one of the worst economic periods in US history, directly caused by his policies.

The attitude on most lemmy instances was "vote blue no matter who dies." You were not allowed to question why 1 million children in Gaza needed to die. You were not allowed to question why Iran needed to be invaded for their "continued transgressions." You were not allowed to question why Biden intentionally destroyed the primary process and thus removed the entire fucking illusion of democracy in the democratic party. Hell when Biden was the candidate you were not allowed to question why a man who had one of the most public mental declines in world history, literally rivaling Nero, was the presumed candidate for president, especially given he had lower approval ratings than Trump by the end of his presidency.

You people (pejorative) were worked into this ridiculous cult-like frenzy, I suppose in response to the cult of Trump, not realizing that's not why Trump won either time.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Regardless of her policies, many didn't vote for Harris because she's a black/asian woman. As long as Americans keep denying that, nothing will change.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The only people that did not vote for her because of her race and gender identity were never going to vote for a democrat, period.

So why did she spend her entire campaign exclusively catering to them?

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No, some registered Democrats didn't vote because of her race and gender as well.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Please provide any data, source, or survey for this claim that is not just 'vibes some racist DNC/Shareblue commentator had.'

Because despite this claim being screeched by an extremely loud minority of non-intersectional identitarians for literally years at this point, I've yet to find a single person that believes this due to actual evidence they can provide.

Yes, the far-right that Harris spent the entirety of her campaign appealing to did not vote for her partially because of her race and gender.

Democrat voters that stayed home vs Obama or Biden did not give a shit about Harris' identity. Just her history and politics, both of which were god awful for someone not running as a Republican.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/06/americans-remain-wary-of-electing-a-female-president-new-poll-reveals-00594591

Here ya go. Took like ten seconds to find.

This adds up with my anecdotal experience as well. I know several Democrats, some women, who will openly say they won't vote for a woman.

Of course there are also many that would never admit that they won't vote for women.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"That includes one-quarter of women under 50 and 20 percent of men under 50, who said they would not back a qualified female candidate for president, while 13 percent of men and women over 50 said they wouldn’t be open to supporting a woman for president."

This is the only line about this, and the poll did not breakdown this derived stat by voter registration. So no. This does not support your thesis that democrat voters didn't vote for Harris because she was a woman.

Not only is this survey not categorizing people along partisan lines, they don't broach the individual topic of Harris' campaign beyond her disastrous campaign introduction and the lack of primary.

So better luck next time. Do read the things you post, or better yet, spend more than ten seconds. Because this article and the conntected source poll do not even support the headline it has.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That's more Americans than registered Republicans.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 27 minutes ago

Which are half of number of republican voters that have voted in the last 3 presidential elections.

Most voters aren't registered with a party, since it's not required to vote, most people don't care about party primaries since they have no constitutional basis or protections and have no legal requirements for operation and that is the exclusive reason you register with a party if you're not planning on running.

Most Democrat voters in these recent state elections were not registered democrats.