this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
232 points (96.8% liked)

Europe

6643 readers
319 users here now

Europe

Rules:

  1. All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
  2. Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
  3. No personal attacks
  4. Posts in English, translations allowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

The resurrection of ‘new atheism’ - As white supremacy reigns supreme in the US, a new book seeks to bring back to the fore one of its ideological branches.

Their works – Dawkins’s, The God Delusion, Harris’s, The End of Faith, Dennett’s, Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, and Hitchens’s, God Is Not Great – were all essentially written as a blind reaction to the 9/11 terrorist attacks and all zoomed in on Islam and the Muslim world, demonstrating a remarkable ignorance of both.

Needless to say, none of the four was able to offer any serious historical understanding of this terror act, why it happened, what it meant, or how to prevent similar acts of wanton violence in the future. Nor did they make any intellectually challenging or noteworthy contribution to the millennia-old debate on belief and disbelief in God.

That publishers have chosen to resurrect, today, this 12-year-old Islamophobic backslapping session advertised as a “landmark discussion about modern atheism” is indeed quite telling. With white supremacy currently flourishing in the US and elsewhere, a book on “new atheism” – a pseudo-intellectual movement that has heavily contributed to its rise – would surely sell.

Before proceeding any further, let us be clear: Atheism as such is a perfectly healthy proposition and the world, including the Muslim part of it, has never been devoid of atheists – all the power to them.

Across religions and cultures, there are decent and reasonable atheists, as there are equally decent and reasonable believers, who can and should openly engage in debate about religion and the belief in God without succumbing to hatred and convictions in one’s supremacy. Such open and honest conversations are indeed healthy for any community or nation and should be encouraged.

So who are these four “new atheist” crusaders (yes, they may deny it, but they are indeed very much the product of the white Western Christian crusader tradition)? They are all white older men, who have never embarked on studying Islam, do not speak Arabic – the language of the Qur’an – and certainly have no special insight into any Muslim community on earth. They are, literally, illiterate.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

If I'm trying to make a point with a single bolded sentence I would maybe choose my words carefully and not use the term for a broad group if I'm talking about a specific subset. They didn't say 'the new-atheism movement' they said 'atheism'.

[–] rzadkie@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

If I was ignorant on how fascism have been again entrenching itself in western society over the last 20 years, on how and through which pipelines ideologies were spread I would at least stay silent instead of trying to pull out semantics :v

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

So I guess by your logic it's fair to say Islam is terroristic. Obviously distinguishing between the broader Islamic community and boko haram or al qaeda is just semantics.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 minutes ago

This is about how Atheism can (and has) be used for colonialism, not that it necessarily follows or must be an integral part of it.

Ironically the New Atheist movement primarily just recycles crusader-age Christian propaganda

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

They are, literally, illiterate.

That's not what illiterate means. If that was the case, every person on Earth who doesn't speak Arabic and study Islam would be illiterate... which is of course completely ridiculous, and bigoted, for that matter.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 minutes ago

It's like becoming a "China critic" without speaking any Chinese or having any concept of Chinese culture but instead repeating racist stereotypes about Chinese people you saw on Fox News.