this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
26 points (93.3% liked)
The Deprogram
1975 readers
78 users here now
"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985
International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.
Rules:
- No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
- No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
- No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).
- Use c/mutual_aid for mutual aid requests.
Resources:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thanks for taking the time. I'm a bit scattered myself, though that's pretty normal for me (ADHD brain probably). To reiterate the spirit of what I was trying to say in my last reply, my beef is generally not with how people talk here; and when it is, I try to take a step back and approach it diplomatically, even if I don't always succeed in that. What's more apt to put me over the edge is people who get put on a pedestal (such as podcasters) but who don't have the accountability or connection to organizing that a revolutionary leader like a Lenin would have. It's not a bad idea to try to reach out to them directly, but it's also a bit of a leaky roof problem and I'm not sure of the how in each case or if they would be receptive to criticism; as in, it isn't even on my radar most of the time and then I'm not sure it's worth the energy since influencer types can range from ignoring feedback, to reading it privately and considering it, to reading it publicly and considering it, to reading it publicly and dunking on it. But in general, it is good advice to try to confront these things at the source, so the point is noted.
That's good to hear.
Forgive me for resorting to other clichés, but it really is true: nothing ventured, nothing gained; fortune favors the bold, etc. So what if they dunk? They already are, anyway.
Oops: thank you, as well. I agree. Small wins are wins, and add up.