this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
192 points (99.0% liked)

politics

30261 readers
2487 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“It speaks to what makes so many of us proud to be Democrats,” he said on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday. “It speaks to a vision that goes back to a New Deal understanding of what working people deserve,” referencing the era of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the label given his domestic policies.

“And I’ll tell you that for too long that kind of politics, you can only find it in history books, and we need to bring it back to the present day.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Check this comment thread, there are literally people calling the healthcare accomplishment we made a "Republican Plan".

You don't have to argue how the tens of millions of carrots aren't 340 million everytime somebody brings up how amaxing the accomplishment is. Nobody ever praised the carrots and opposed making more, that is a nonexistent stance. The only reason to criticize the limited scope of the carrots is to shame the DNC.

The DNC have accomplished good with every paultry majority they've scraped together and I'm sick of disingenuous assholes claiming otherwise.

[–] itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because it literally was. It was a version of Romneycare, that's part of why they couldn't repeal and replace, there's nothing they could replace it with cause it was their plan.

Shame is good. Shame is one of the few means we have of sending a message that their actions are unacceptable. They don't represent you or me, they represent their donors. And before you get on your high horse - yes I vote for these corrupt assholes, but I don't understand why we would be content with this. I don't understand why you're defending them. It's like Stockholm syndrome or something. Maybe if they actually stood for something they'd have more than a paltry majority. They can't even stand against genocide, like, for fucks sake that's the bare minimum. I think that's what's been so eye opening for so many recently.

Other countries aren't like this. Our country wasn't always like this. Things can be different. The system has been completely consumed by the interests of the wealthy and wealth inequality is higher than it's ever been.

Mandami talks about FDR style governing. The last time a Democrat tried that he got elected 4 times and ended up dying in office. Don't tell me thats unelectable.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 2 days ago

We've had 48 or less DNC Senators for over 13 years. Shame has not worked at fucking all and is commonly disingenuous shame like yours refusing to admit they did something good.