this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
1129 points (98.5% liked)

Work Reform

16682 readers
1579 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

Yes, but the first one is not true.

Tired of calling what countries like Australia and Germany have as "universal healthcare".

It isn't. Simply isn't.

In the case of Australia most familiar with. It's a weird mix of public and private, with most medical costs covered under a private subsidy model, where your health service can change whatever, and you have to pay the gap between the Medicare rebate and what the services charges.

Doesn't cover dental, has a small rebate for physio and other allied health (again, private providers, public rebate) and covers a basic check up for eyes every 3 years only, but doesn't cover most optical.

The hospital system is also an absolute mess of a two-tiered system I won't get into here.

It's not fucking universal and I'm sick of people pretending like it is. It's just kilometres better than the USA, which is the lowest bar ever.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yeah, similarly in Canada which actually is single payer so yay, but is constantly, constantly under attack by privatisation hawks.

It's a constant fucking struggle to keep the rich from raiding our commons. They're always grasping, groping, taking, draining. It's exhausting.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If it covers everyone, then it's universal. Doesn't mean that it can't be improved, but that's literally what universal healthcare coverage means.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Universal healthcare means it covers all healthcare. If you're needing pay pay out of pocket to private providers, and it doesn't even cover a bunch of things, I refuse to call that universal - and so should you.

Universal means nothing, otherwise.

Medicare defenders really need to dream bigger, damn.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Universal healthcare means it covers all healthcare.

I mean, no. It doesn't. And as an example off the top of my head, the NHS in the UK doesn't cover dental. It's still universal health care.

I'm not defending Medicare or anything here, id appreciate it if you didn't put words in my mouth.

Simply explaining what the term means.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

We shall have to agree to disagree then. Calling a healthcare system that doesn't cover all available healthcare universal just doesn't make sense.

I can accept that's what people call it, but that's about it.

I think they're wrong.

By this logic the USA has universal healthcare, because a hospital must treat you for emergency, life-saving care, even if you're unable to pay.

So, the definition is absurd if it's just that a system covers everyone.

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That's not at all how it works in Germany, though. Dental treatments are paid, as is medication. There is a surcharge for medication, which is capped at 10 Euros. And some dental options, which are not strictly necessary (debatable in many cases, I'll give you that!) are not included. Physio and optical costs are also included.

Some of the payments require a doctor's prescription in order to be accepted, but I would call that pretty fucking universal.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Dental treatments are paid

Nonsense. Dental treatments are slightly subsidised, but even with the subsidy are more expensive than paying outright in cash in France. They are only covered if you're, like, gonna die from a tooth infection or something, and then they'll remove it but not do anything about the missing tooth. The subsidy doesn't even fully cover simple fillings, which still cost more than 100€ even for shitty resin ones. Let alone a ceramic crown for a front tooth which is like 600-1000€. Why do you think everyone goes to Poland or Turkey when they need real dental care?

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, here's what is subsidised, assuming you speak German:

https://www.verbraucherzentrale.de/wissen/gesundheit-pflege/krankenversicherung/alle-kassenleistungen-der-zahnmedizin-im-ueberblick-12921

Call that nonsense if you wish, I'm not going to enter into a discussion of that kind.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

So clearly you haven't been to the dentist in Germany, or even read that very article you posted. Yes the 6-monthly checkup is covered, that's great. But the subsidy for fillings in molars, for example, only covers amalgam fillings. Dentists don't actually do those anymore, so you have to pay more than 100€ "extra" to get a resin one. The majority of other situations are similar to that. In the end, even though the rule says that medically necessary things are supposed to be covered, in practice they really aren't.