this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
126 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

85870 readers
3837 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 29 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Just fyi IPv8 was written by LLM with full on hallucinated citations and references. It isn’t being taken seriously by anyone.

It didn’t even make sense. It relies on DNS for nat and the like. Deranged networking plans from the non-mind of an LLM.

I recommend taking the time to learn IPv6 properly. It’s actually quite elegant and brings back the peer to peer, endpoint to endpoint connection ability of the old internet.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Oi...well that sucks ass. A good idea, badly conceptualized I guess.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t even say it was a good idea. Like the end to end NAT free internet is the ideal. IPv6 was built for that.

Even if IPv8 was not slop it would reenforce the idea of nat and hierarchy.

IPv6 allows for a democratized internet where anyone can choose to self host. And anyone can connect to anyone who is self hosting.

Because of this it’s a bit more complicated. But ideology it much better than IPv8. It brings us back what made the internet great in the 90s and 2000s, but at scale.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Probably true...but I just don't see it taking off...

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

IPv6 is now peaking over 50% of all internet traffic globally and trending up. IPv4 is today the minority of internet traffic.

In some countries like France IPv6 over 85% of all internet traffic. In Germany over 75%. USA 57% of all traffic. India 76% of all traffic.

Not a fan of Google but they keep statistics on adoption.

https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I literally just got the notifiation from Verizon today that IPV6 was now supported by their network... Ubiquiti asked me if I wanted to enable it, my response is basically not until I understand it...

Then again, it took me 20 years to really understand IPv4, so it's likely I'm going to be decaying before I get v6. ;-)

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Have faith in yourself. I bet you could get things in a few hours with focused study if you have a deep understanding of IPv4.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

LOL....my ADHD has gotten much worse with age... "Focus" is a fond memory. ;-}