Sounds like a great way to curate a list of homelab targets. I'm good, thanks.
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
87 points (93.1% liked)
Technology
85833 readers
3590 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Was just thinking that it would be such a juicy target for so many things. I also shall pass on this one.
TLD's aren't the limitation... Public IPs are.. If it wasn't for Cloudflared, I couldn't run half the shit I run.
in an ideal world, ipv6 would solve that problem...
😔
I saw the rfc for IPV8 recently... It makes so much more sense than ipv6...and is backward compatible with ipv4...
Basically they're proposing prefacing 4 more octets into an IP address, so 172.16.5.1 would become 0.0.0.0.172.16.5.1
Any existing IPs would just assume the 0.0.0.0 in front of them...
Again...solves the problem on much the same way.
Just fyi IPv8 was written by LLM with full on hallucinated citations and references. It isn’t being taken seriously by anyone.
It didn’t even make sense. It relies on DNS for nat and the like. Deranged networking plans from the non-mind of an LLM.
I recommend taking the time to learn IPv6 properly. It’s actually quite elegant and brings back the peer to peer, endpoint to endpoint connection ability of the old internet.
That's not how header backward compatibility works. IPv4 routers would discard the packet, not prepend zeroes.
Sometimes these new TLDs are just odd. And the odder they are, the more expensive they are.
The proposal is for them to be free, restricted to one per person.
the pdf says a sub domain. which is something that could be provided by a single domain on an existing tld.
Given the context, the four "Follow Us" links going to proprietary services does seem somewhat antithetical to .self ideals.
At the very least set up a Mastodon account somewhere in addition to those.
upstream connect error or disconnect/reset before headers. reset reason: remote connection failure, transport failure reason: delayed connect error: Connection refused
You, uh, might want to try that again.
But I did :'(
When can I sign up