this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
62 points (91.9% liked)
Programming
27502 readers
142 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is a weird outcome and contrary to the experiences of most users. The tendency that is commonly observed is that, on the contrary, agents don't really "hold opinions" and flip-flop the moment you start challenging them. I'd be curious to learn what model and setup gave you an agent that defends its hallucinations because that is definitely an outlier in a world of sycophantic models that have been RLHF'd to hell and back.
In my experience, this is a tell that you are holding it very wrong. You can shit on models for having no creativity or losing track of long horizon tasks but following instructions is the one thing they do well. Again, stupid model or stupid harness, or you're just not holding the pointy end in the right direction.
US tech marketing is done by assholes targeting morons. It is probably safer to never, ever take their statements at face value.
There are 2 categories of people who are dead wrong about agentic coding : rabid vibe-coders who think it 10x their productivity (it doesn't, it just exacerbates their worst tendencies), and people like you who think it's good for nothing. Both categories are just vibing based on a gut feeling. But in the middle there is a whole spectrum of actually interesting experimentation, if you are ready to fist fight your personal assumptions and be fact-based about it.
It's not weird. The good side of the LLM craze is that its failures are documented at length all over the Internet. It's in every tech blog out there, even in those run by users of agents. There isn't a day without a LLM article on the front page of HN and Lobste.rs.
I don't actually hate the tech itself, and, like most, am pretty impressed at what it can do at the moment - the way I'm impressed by what the useless Boston Dynamics robots can do.
I oppose LLM usage for practical, very rational reasons. The most important aspect is an ethical one: the planet is burning, I don't want to make things worse by using something that barely even works.
There is another, very important aspect: I can't actually run it locally, which means relying on it means depending on external suppliers from an enemy country that may cut the pipes without prior notice, as it tried to do very recently.
Additionally, the costs are very high, increasing and enshittification has barely even started. Once monopolies are established, I don't want to have to pay soaring cartel prices for a shitty service I could have avoided depending upon to begin with.
There's still a broad range of domains that are fundamentally incompatible with usage of LLMs because of reliability and/or confidentiality reasons, and I want to remain employable as a software engineer and stand out from the legion of CRUD developers whose skills will inevitably atrophy as LLM adoption increases.
I do see how I could use them sporadically, but cf. reason #1. Using LLMs is immoral.
And I do know how to do my job. I don't have a velocity issue. As they say, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.