Wikipedia

5095 readers

238 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Only links to Wikipedia permitted
Please stick to the format "Article Title (other descriptive text/editorialization)"
Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails
On Casual Tuesdays, we allow submissions from wikis other than Wikipedia.

Recommended:

Use the search box to see if someone has previously submitted an article. Some apps will also notify you if you are resubmitting an article previously shared on Lemmy.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

dantheclamman@lemmy.world

Plum@lemmy.world

135

1% rule - 1% of users actively create new content, while 99% lurk. (en.wikipedia.org)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to c/wikipedia@lemmy.world

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In Internet culture, the 1% rule is a general rule of thumb pertaining to participation in an Internet community, stating that only 1% of the users of a website actively create new content, while the other 99% of the participants only lurk. Variants include the 1–9–90 rule (sometimes 90–9–1 principle or the 89:10:1 ratio),[1] which states that in a collaborative website such as a wiki, 90% of the participants of a community only consume content, 9% of the participants change or update content, and 1% of the participants add content.

Similar rules are known in information science; for instance, the 80/20 rule known as the Pareto principle states that 20 percent of a group will produce 80 percent of the activity, regardless of how the activity is defined.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Now add in bots reposting spam-blog slop and see how it shifts. It seems like 80% of the posts I'm seeing on Lemmy are bots just spamming articles to pay-walled news articles or someone's news blog, all without any text or description other than a click-bait title, to drive traffic to the site.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago

On instances where the admins proactively seek out and tag bots and AI slop (like mine), the threadiverse looks quite different.

Shop around.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Bots are generally spotted pretty quick and banned, though some do slip through. It is certainly not 80% on Lemmy (my perception is more like 7 to 10%).

Many people post links to news since it is relatively low effort, and something that can be done consistently to keep a community active and encourage discussion. That's not to say more original content wouldn't be appreciated and is needed, but as we are still small, there likely isn't a big enough pool of people who can create higher effort original stuff to keep up a constant 'supply', for lack of a better term.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

A majority of what I'm seeing might not be bots but is definitely "low effort" as you said. I'll browse through the Hot posts across all instances Federated with my instance and it seems like most of what I see is just low-effort, copy-paste links with no description in the body of the post and a click-bait title leading to a pay-walled news article.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

seems more likely on reddit than lemmy. i dont see that many bots on lemmy, and they are usually the most trolly or downvoted comments.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Weird. I'd put that at 10% or less of what I see. But I've blocked several communities and users.