this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
12 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6781 readers
313 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sir Keir Starmer has announced an extra £15bn for defence over the next four years, but warned it would mean some road and energy projects will now be scrapped.

The UK prime minister said on Tuesday that the long-awaited defence investment plan (DIP) would reverse the “corrosive hollowing out” of the armed forces and transform a military that has been “underfunded and unsuited to the threats we face”.

He called the blueprint “a platform on which I know my successor will build”. It has been signed off by Andy Burnham, to whom Starmer is expected to hand over power as soon as July 20.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think it's right for the UK and Europe in general to invest in defence. Europe is on its own; nobody else will defend the continent. If Europe can't defend itself then it probably won't be long until the US or Russia or China decides they'd like a piece of European land for themselves (well Russia is already trying to take European land of course).

[–] huf@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The us has completely vassalized Europe and here you are crying about Russia.

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't like the current governments of the US or Russia, but let's remember that Russia is currently waging an invasion of a European country while the US is not. I hope Europe can build sufficient defence capabilities to prevent further Russian aggression towards Europe, or indeed any future American aggression towards Europe.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the US doesnt need to invade europe, the US has troops stationed all over europe. US security agencies are elbow deep in european states. the US blew up nordstream to sabotage europe. the US did a coup in ukraine to get the current war going.

but sure.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Some would call thousands of foreign troops stationed in a country an occupying force.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

UK is already the sixth biggest spender on defence without this latest "upgrade". Where is all the money going if - supposedly - we don't have a large standing army, much of the hardware doesn't work and it takes weeks for a military vessel to set sail? Lots of this is propaganda, of course. Maybe not upgrading all the nukes at a cost of £63 billion might shift some of the money? Maybe asking WHO is being defended would be a good starting point? (And it aint the ordinary UK citizen.)