Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
view the rest of the comments
how so?
Nazi re-revisionistically dogwhistling: Nazis can use this to dogwhistles with each other exactly how Norse symbols have been revisioned. Norse culture has nothing to do with Naziprop, but they can reutilize this.
I can def. see this as reclaiming tactics in say anarchist zones. But in neutral zones it could be utilized double-edged.
Telling people not to paint over Swastikas that sounds like a dogwhistle
Reading comprehension is something we all have to encourage. Try either finding a master tutor to guide you in antifa praxis, or rereading with a strong Black Anarchist perspective.

They might have read your comment better than you did yourself.
Then they would be composting Nazis, and making better arrows.
But I am sure that's what the “not-worth-reading” had in mind, right?
Let's see. You called for a "master tutor" of "antifa praxis" but let's assume that was a joke. You posted a link to one of your own comments and described it as "strong". And now you're implying that your own comment, when read correctly, is able to single-handedly motivate people into direct acion. It all seems a bit patronising.
Could you be a dear and point to who patronized who?
I was referring to the stuff you wrote after that but it's fine if you don't want to talk about it.
I’m a talker, it’s how we solidify.
Did you by any chance had the time to reread the thread from Quokka’s frontend?
’Cause people in PyLova can already see the little breadcrumbs I left regarding my intersectionary ways.
Let's see, do you know about turf warfare?
But what about this?
Wikipedia's random page? What of it?
Yeah, seems irrelevant, doesn't it?
It depends. Do you want to talk about racists’ turfs, or anarchist zones?
You're really over thinking this.
I wish.
Same energy.