this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
49 points (98.0% liked)

World News

56907 readers
1368 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Korea's total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have in her lifetime — rose to 0.93 in March, up 0.15 on year. The rate has now stayed above 0.9 for three consecutive months, following readings of 0.99 in January and 0.93 in February. For the first quarter as a whole, the fertility rate stood at 0.95, up 0.12 compared to a year earlier.

The increase in births was driven largely by women in their 30s. In the first quarter, the number of births per 1,000 women aged 30 to 34 rose by 11.3 to 88.5, and the rate for women aged 35 to 39 climbed 9 to 62.4. By contrast, women aged 25 to 29 and those 40 and older showed much smaller gains of 1.7 and 0.5, respectively.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thepig@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ummm you know is still nowherenear enough, 0.9 is far far from the maintenance rate

[–] stenAanden@feddit.dk -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This has been brought up before but many have noted the hypocrisy of the entire internet being obsessed with the fertility rate of South Korea when it isn't that much different from the rest of the world.

Why is Korea touted as a country disappearing when most of the world is in the same situation?

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 6 points 1 day ago

Usually because the below countries have much lower immigration making the issue much more visible.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s not really the same is it? (From Our World in Data ).

It matters a lot if the rate is 1.2, over half what’s needed to replace both parents, or 0.7, which is less than a third. The numbers might seem close but the small differences matter a lot.

ourworldindata

[–] stenAanden@feddit.dk 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No? They are both too low? They are not very different.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

No, they look not so different because the absolute numbers are not that far off. But if you try to realize what they mean and what it means if this is kept up over multiple generations you will understand that they are very different.