this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
164 points (97.1% liked)

politics

30286 readers
2415 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh its rich people. And the overwhelming majority of them being boomers.

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Musk and Zuckerberg aren't boomers.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

And? There's other rich people out there

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Silent Generation, Boomers, Gen X, or Millennials: which of these has the most wealth?

Do any of them have over 35% of the nation's wealth?

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Thank you.

It seems that according to your chart:

in 1990, baby boomers had perhaps less than 20% of the wealth—presumably early boomers such as Trump or Clinton had most of it, but over 50% were Silent Generation (such as Larry Ellison) and earlier. Also Papa Bush was President, and Thatcher and Mulroney were PMs (UK and Canada respectively).

in 2000, baby boomers had perhaps perhaps 40% of the wealth, and the oldest Gen Xer was 35. Clinton was President, Blair and Chrétien were PMs (UK and Canada respectively).

in 2010, baby boomers probably had over 50% of the wealth—though probably less than 55%—and I'd say perhaps 70% of millennials were of voting age. Obama—a Boomer—was President, Brown and then Cameron—both Gen Xers—were PMs of UK, while Harper—a boomer—lead minority government in Canada (Michael Ignatieff—a liberal and Liberal Russian-Canadian intellectual Boomer was Opposition leader).

in 2020, baby boomers probably still had over 50% of the wealth—though probably less than 56%—with Gen X and Millennials having almost 25% of the wealth with Silent and earlier have perhaps less than 15%. Trump was President and Boris Johnson was PM—both boomers. Gen Xer Trudeau was Canadian PM. This was the big Covid-19 year.

in 2025 (Q4), baby boomers probably still had over 50% of the wealth, with Gen X and Millennials having perhaps 35% of the wealth with Silent and earlier have perhaps more than 10%. Trump was President, Keir Starmer (another Boomer) and Mark Carney (another Gen Xer) were PMs.

In 2028, the youngest Boomer will be 63 years old, while the oldest (such as Trump) will be 82. If the perception is most are sedentary fat asses on their electric scooters, and that this is indeed unhealthy, then many will die off by then. If one of these is not true, then many will be alive and will perhaps give some hope for those younger who maybe be wishing to greet the 22nd century alive and healthy, or at least relatively healthy.

From 2010 to 2015 Gen X and Millennials went from about 8% of the wealth, to about 35%, or about 4.375x or about 4.3% per annum. At this rate by 2028, they will have about 48% of the wealth, or get to 50% in about 9 years—2035. At this point, the youngest Boomer will be 88, the youngest Gen Xer 70, the youngest Millennial 54, the youngest Zoomer 21, and perhaps a third of Generation Alpha be of voting age.

I predict that in 2028, the Presidency will go to either J.D. Vance, or a centrist Democrat—perhaps Newsom—and 2032 will probably go to the incumbent—In the past 100 years only 7 first-term incumbents were succeeded by another, over the course of less than 22 years: 2 were in the 1920s, one was assassinated, one was a Democrat who lost to Reagan, one arguably had his vote split by a billionaire "outsider" who regarded both parties with contempt ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naHdnyogJjA 1:02 ), and one who was/is an octogenarian.

(FWIW, I predicted Dubya would win in 2004, Obama in 2008, again in 2012, Clinton in 2016, and around Sept/Oct 2020, that Biden would win. 😁)