Bluesky Social 🦋

217 readers

4 users here now

Bluesky is a federated social network built on ATProtocol.

Rules:

Follow lemmy.zip's site-wide rules.
All posts must, in some way, relate to Bluesky or ATProto.
Do not make duplicate posts.
Do not post x.com links.

Useful Links:

News, discussion, and memes are all allowed here.

See also:

!peoplebluesky@lemmy.world - for screenshots of Bluesky posts

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

airportline@lemmy.zip

User ban controversy reveals Bluesky’s decentralized aspiration isn’t reality (plus.flux.community)

submitted 5 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/Bluesky@lemmy.zip

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Bluesky’s protocol is so complicated that not even the biggest alternative network has figured out how to become independent

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Downstream.

As in, an unoriginal derivative.

[–] airportline@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I didn’t know there were people who saw that as a bad thing when it comes to software.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

It can be good, or bad, or both, or neither, adownstream on its own is just like... derived from, based on.

But also implicit in that is that... it ... is not the same as the thing it is based on.

It either adds or removes things or does something similar but in a different way.

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Probably a good and bad thing. Openly taking open source software and improving is good, copying an idea, overlaying it with a false sense of security or decentralization but really just being another version of the same thing with no real improvement is bad.