this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
307 points (94.2% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

5206 readers
8 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 86 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I actually thought this was a god tier shitpost until I realized this is unironic

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Pretty much every time I open Facebook, I am getting at least one post that is unironically advocating for biblical polygamy. Usually with shitty AI comics.

With how rapidly the U.S. is turning into the Handmaid’s Tale, it feels like this is a botted attempt to shift the Overton window into deeper christofascism.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

biblical polygamy

TIL, I had no idea this was a thing. wow.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

According to the Bible, King Solomon (the wise king) had 700 wives and 300 concubines.

His father, David (the one who killed Goliath), had 8 wives that are mentioned in the text.

So "Biblical marriage" could be monogamy (like Mary and Joseph) or a wide variety of polygamous options. Either way, the most important part is that women must be faithful to only one husband.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

More specific would be "historical polygamy from Biblical times." Like, "kings and stuff did it back then."

Anybody who thinks that means the Bible is for this need only look at the actual Biblical accounts of the many kings therein: Occasionally wise, fatally flawed, ultimately lonely and empty despite having the world of men in their hand.

It is not the role of man, to rule over other men (or women).

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

man I wish we could all just leave the abrahamic fanfic fights behind the species.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's polygamy for one gender only.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

sounds mormon to me lol. wait is that considered biblical even though they have their own fanfic?

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

your algo thinks you're a cultist/fundamentalist.

or that you're just obsessed with their content.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s weird, because it also thinks I’m Muslim. All of the reels are about how to know if I’m doing wudu right.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

hasn't islam had that kind of ... "biblical polygamy" traditionally? i remember reading/hearing somewhere that men could have multiple wifes as long as they could pay for their resources. or is that just not contemporary anymore?

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

haha, my algo on youtube thinks I'm a menopausal latina woman. i get lots of ads in spanish for estrogen replacement drugs.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

plot twist: you are a menopausal latina woman?

[–] RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

I'm not convinced it's serious. That last sentence sounds like a joke.