this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
120 points (98.4% liked)
Linux
14245 readers
396 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Nice move. AppImage makes distribution much simpler, especially for people who don't want to depend on a specific package manager.
IMO flatpaks are a better option, appimages are just bringing people back to the insecure "find it on a website and download it" method of package management
This is also one of the reasons why I dislike curl sh
Flatpaks can be unsafe too though.
Same goes for .debs from Debian stable. There is no absolute safety. But downloading unsigned code from a random website is far down the safe list.
AppImage uses grossly outdated core component like FUSE2, and comes with zero sandboxing by default.
IMO, flatpak needs to improve in terms of security, but it is a strict improvement over AppImage.
I still prefer repositories, but official AppImages beat unofficial downloads.