this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
207 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30342 readers
1947 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The executive counsel at the fossil fuel behemoth ExxonMobil is leaving his role to join the Trump Justice Department’s newly renamed Energy and Natural Resources Division, a move one watchdog organization said shows that “Big Oil’s capture of the US government is now complete.”

Robert Levy, who worked at Exxon for 17 years, announced in a recent LinkedIn post that he is departing the company, whose profits surged amid the Trump administration’s illegal war on Iran. Levy will reportedly serve as senior counsel at the DOJ’s Energy and Natural Resources Division, which the Trump Justice Department renamed last month from the Environment and Natural Resources Division.

Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday that “the new so-called Energy and Natural Resources Division at the Justice Department explicitly aims to abuse emergency powers to drive oil and gas production, override state environmental enforcement, and generally serve at the beck and call of Big Oil.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't get at it, you're right. This is Fort Knox. I see twelve armed guards in this photo alone.

kFWRNhM7AuqQINa.jpg

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't think Gaia would approve of destroying the environment in an act of ecoterrorism.

Pesonally, I just want to see a transition to clean energy.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But she appreciates the continued, but slower destruction, right?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am one of the few people that recognize we have lost around a billion people to premature death from environmental degredation in the last fifty years.

If you think we need more death and destruction I guess you can bear that responsibility.

I think there has already been enough death, it is time to reflect and change but the entrenched wealthy keep fighting back.

I don't think ecoterrorism is the way forward.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A transition to clean energy means humans get to continue raping the rest of the natural world. It's not just fossil fuels that are killing the planet, it's us replacing the natural world with more us and our livestock.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey, if you want to kill humanity that is on you. This is no longer about Captain Planet though.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I don't wanna kill anything except wild game, I'm here for a good time not a long time.