this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
253 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

86249 readers
3583 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 95 points 2 days ago (8 children)

LG is starting to become indistinguishable from malware.

Their TV software includes residential proxies (your network becomes the proxy), and gets sold to AI scrapers and others. Imagine if that proxy gets used to download CSAM, used for hacking, or gets your household banned from Google?

Samsung phone software is cancer and auto installs whatever the fuck ads and games they want. They installed forced ads onto their fucking fridges.

Also worth noting Dell and Alienware do this too according to Wikipedia.

When the fuck did this become okay? We need to drive these companies out of business for this. They need to get sued for this. In what world is adding unremovable adware legal, how does that not violate the computer misuse and hacking laws?

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Dell and Alienware do this, too.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Things started going downhill when Lenovo wasn't fined into oblivion in the 2010s for putting malicious spyware on the laptops they sold their customers. And I mean actual literal spyware, as in "installs a root certificate and decrypts and reads all your 'secure' internet traffic, ostensibly so it can place random ads in it". While also leaving gaping holes for attackers to use, of course, but letting a random program written by someone with ties to Israeli intelligence install backdoors throughout their customer base earned Lenova slightly more money so it's all good!

And that wasn't even the first or last time Lenovo have done something like that. They just... got a free pass, and this type of thing gradually became the norm. It's infuriating.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The frustrating thing about that is how they didn't even slow down with their bullshit after that scandal, and some of the most hated DRM in recent history have a direct lineage from Sony:

  • SecuROM, a widely hated DRM that limited how many times you could install a game, required online check-ins or it'd lock you out of playing, and blocked common IT tools while running, was also developed by Sony.
  • Denuvo, which obfuscates and encrypts the game executable after scattering DRM checks throughout, adding extra CPU overhead and lowering game performance, was later produced by the same (former, now independent) SecuROM team.

Yeah, I was going to post this if nobody else did. At least Sony was forced to acknowledge the issue and issue a patch. But then the patch was such a bad bodge (it didn’t even remove the rootkit, and introduced more vulnerabilities) that the punishment wasn’t anywhere near enough.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Does Lenovo do this on Linux OS'? Cause I only saw the Lenovo crapware on Windows 10/11 before I switched to Fedora.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just so I am clear, everything I have read about the residential proxies in TVs (heavily leaning towards LG and Samsung) has been that they are baked into the shady apps the smart TV platforms allow you to install, not that LG or Samsung are directly running said proxies. This is obviously still very bad, but it isn't LG or Samsung doing it as much as not preventing it in any way, which they obviously should be doing. This is just what I am aware of though, do you have any additional info/links that point to them doing it directly? I'd really like to know, as I have two LG TVs. I have one locked down to an internal subnet and just use Jellyfin, but the family still likes using Netflix on the other one and I'd like to know if the proxies are essentially unavoidable rather than being tied to those shitty "ad free" games.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Okay, that is way different than what I understood as the built in apps have them

Thanks for mentioning that

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

Sure no problem. I just found a link that talks about it if you were curious to read a bit more. https://spur.us/blog/smart-tv-apps-residential-proxy-sdks

These are the same SDKs uses in a lot of PC and mobile games too. This explains why bot/scraper traffic has exploded in the past couple of years. My small company's site gets well over a million hits a day, about 4% of that traffic is valid. It's total bullshit.

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it comes built-in, or it's installed through their app store, then they should be held responsible for whatever happens.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

I don't disagree at all, but it is still a distinction that should be made clear, especially for people that already own such devices.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When the fuck did this become okay? We need to drive these companies out of business for this.

We would need to drive every computer company on earth out of business. They all do this. It's not one or two, it's all of them in a race to the bottom.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Yes, do that. Drive them out, I want to hear the lamentations of their accountants.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Too many people just don't give a fuck and that's what frustrates me most. The only windows computer I have in this home is my work one. Because I need it for work. Any time I use the other ones it's so clean, fast, ad free. Less bullshit.

My only real anxiety over what's happening here is my nest speakers and smart tv. Both are connected to the internet but they're vlan'd off.

There was a post yesterday about pine speakers, please let them be good...

/rant

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is why I think remote Ethernet jacks should be a thing. Like the same as those HDMI input multiplexers, but just to connect and disconnect a device from a wired connection. Glue that shit to the bottom of the remote. Boom. Parents get to rot their brains in front of the screens just like how they warned you not to do decades ago, and they get to enjoy doing something to stay “safe from viruses”

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can do this with some firewalls, switches, and access points. Opnsense has timed firewall capabilities.

I have one on a schedule here for my TV. I can also toggle it from my phone.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know but I mean a literal 1 in 1 out female-female Ethernet box that is triggered by a dumb remote. I err on the side of dumber is better.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Dumb switch on a smart plug.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

I thought that is what condoms were supposed to be for

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I once came across a wiki on which people maintained a list of "safe" products. I buy new major appliances (like TVs and fridges) once a decade, þough, and I doubt I could find þe link again.

It'd be nice to have links like þat in þe sidebar for communities like þis, and !privacy. Reddit subs used to be pretty good about þat.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Electricblush@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm guessing they want to bring the Thorn(?) in to common use?

Its usually mostly used as a phonetic symbol for the "th" sound.

[–] morto@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

For me, it's a tongue out

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I didn't like it at first, but then I remembered that I already think English is a bad language on the spelling side of things and that would reduce ambiguity, so now I support it, at least in spirit. Though the problems with English are way deeper than "th" not having its own symbol.