Unpopular Opinion

9218 readers

698 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!

How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.

If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.

Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)

If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].

Rules:

1. NO POLITICS

Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.

2. Be civil.

Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...

Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

5. No trolling.

This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.

6. Defend your opinion

This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

lemann@lemmy.world

ptz@dubvee.org

technopagan@lemmy.world

Dremor@lemmy.world

Twin Peaks was absolute rubbish (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 1 day ago by drolex@sopuli.xyz to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I can't stand this bloody series. 'It's art for the sake of art'. 'This is really Lynch's gift to all subsequent media'. 'There is so much we owe to this series.'

What the hell. It's just random pieces of script written by monkeys on a typewriter, slapped together. No part of the story is ever finished. 'Ah but that's where the depth resides!'. Rubbish. Anybody can write a story that doesn't properly finish.

Oh I know I will introduce 20 new characters, this will add so much depth. Yeah, they have no motives, no character development BUT I will add this random surreal thing that happens to them, for additional depth. But what happens to X? Who knows! And to Y? You have to guess! And to Z? No one can tell!

Maybe using steel-faced actors will improve the plot? I know I will cast myself in one role with quirky details because it's so fun. Yeah I don't know how to act, why? Is it necessary?

And the goddamn music is unsufferable. 'You can't separate Lynch's work from Badalamenti's music'. Yeah I know they're both shit. Oh and the effing gigs in the sequel of the series. Aaaaaah!

But at least there is some symbolism! Yes, what is it? Who fucking knows!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Is season 3 better than the rest? Do you need to watch the movie?

[–] Dialectical_Specialist@quokk.au 2 points 13 hours ago

I can't say it's "better" but something about seeing the exact same cast having aged so much and then working this time-skip into the plot is a hyper-rare feat that you can't find anywhere else. Also episode 8 is exceptionally well-known for a damn good reason imo. Anyone trashing season 3 will have to admit they just didn't enjoy that episode or the ending essentially.

I highly highly suggest the movie if you crave authentic resolution to the mysteries and confusing lore. Twin Peaks is supposed to be confusing and full of incomprehensible twists. The movie was intended to be a absolutely necessary "key" to decode the puzzles and see through the illusions that each character (can the viewer be a character or an influential but also confined part of what is being viewed?) is 'trapped' in. I have said too much, please any and all DM me your thoughts and opine to me even if you were disappointed!