Sure. But lemmy would still not show Mastodon posts outside communities even if they supported that extension. Both parties need to move towards each other.

Det er også fordi jeg først lige nu har hentet fællesskabet tror jeg :P

!brandnewsentence@lemmy.world 🤷

Er det ikke holdningen for de fleste partier?

ActivityPub is an extensible protocol. It is not just one thing. Lemmy only supports posts that follow that extension I linked above. That extension has a definition and Lemmy follows it so in that way it is "standard". But it is an extension, not part of the core protocol.

Mastodon and most other fediverse services do not support this extension.

Its not that anyone is "doing it wrong" and Mastodon doesn't really support Lemmys communities either. So Lemmy works in a bit of a funky way that doesn't match most other fediverse services.

Its just a bit strange that Lemmy does not support the more common posts outside communities since that is how most of the fediverse works, so we're kinda missing out on a lot of content that we can't see on Lemmy.

This is the FEP Lemmy uses but most other fediverse services do not use it and Lemmy does not support anything that doesn't use this FEP. So again, it's not that Lemmy is doing something wrong, but Lemmy is not supporting how most of the rest of the fediverse functions.

I think Mastodon is very far from standard

I think it's much closer to standard than Lemmy and I've looked into it quite a bit recently. ActivityPub is unfortunately quite focused on microblogging. Honestly lemmys way of doing it is a little hacky.

As for the posts outside communities? That makes sense lemmy-wise I think. Where would those posts be?

I actually think it's quite straightforward, they'd just be on a users page. This is actually how Reddit has also done it ever since they introduced the feature (much before they enshittified everything else).

You can think of it like every users profile being a community of its own but only the user itself can post to it. Just conceptually speaking.

That would also let you follow users just as you can follow communities.

I mean you could equally ask why does Lemmy not support posts outside communities? It's on both parties to interoperate I think. Lemmy also uses a specific extension to ActivityPub while Discourse's posts and Mastodon's posts and such are pretty standard, but still not picked up by Lemmy.

It has ActivityPub support so it is connected to the fediverse in some ways. Lemmy doesn't work with it though AFAIK because Lemmy doesn't support posts made outside communities.

If there was a Reddit/Lemmy style website (where people create communities for various subjects but it’s all available from the same website using the same credentials) with forum style discussions

Isn't this just Discourse?

Ved Enhedslistens årsmøde tidligere i år stillede 22 medlemmer af partiet, herunder fire medlemmer af hovedbestyrelsen, et forslag om at genoptage støtten til DFLP. Det blev ikke vedtaget.

Det er altså 4 ud af de 25 medlemmer i hovedbestyrelsen der blandt andre stillede dette forslag. Det er 16% af hovedbestyrelsen, lige under 1/6 (16.6...%). Dvs at hvis man skulle udelukke nogen så ville det kræve at alle de andre 21 medlemmer stemte for det (hvis man antager at de resterende 4 ville stemme imod).

Jeg har ikke noget problem med privat praksis, men de bør aflønnes med samme takst som i det offentlige og uden brugerbetaling

Jeg kan igen godt se motivationen, men tager man ikke noget frihed væk fra folk når de ikke har mulighed for at finansiere (via brugerbetaling) en lægepraksis/skole som de vil have den? Men det er måske ikke en frihed der betyder så meget? Det er jo kun dem der er ressourcestærke (og dermed allerede har meget frihed på anden vis) der har mulighed for at give den finansiering.