this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
305 points (99.7% liked)
Technology
86302 readers
3756 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Facebook has the money to hire enough moderators, though. They're starting to not grow any more, but content moderation is one of the last things that should get cut instead of the first. When Yahoo started dying*, moderation was also the first thing to go.
Like a canary in a coal mine.
* it's technically not dead, but it's basically dead. People keep telling me Yahoo is inevitable, and its continued existence is evidence of this. /s
I agree with everything that you’re saying and yes they have a lot of money. Do you see what I’m saying about how this could require millions and millions of moderators at the kind of scale they operate? A significant portion of humanity is on social media.
Meta earns about $200 billion in revenue and $60 billion in profit. How many mods would $60bil actually buy?
Let’s work with a total cost of $50k per moderator. This is very conservative since only a fraction of that would be salary (the rest insurance, HR, management, taxes, equipment, etc).
If they spent their entire profit on mods, they could hire 1.2 million. Is that enough to moderate several billion? Maybe.
Now should we consider costs they could actually sustain? Taking their entire profit to zero is, understandably, not possible for any company. I think this is where most people just wave their hand and say “who cares” or “fuck em” or just assumes they have infinite money.
But to seriously consider this… it’s just a very big challenge for anyone to pull off.
Zuck is one of the richest people on the planet. He has the kind of money that could track the original source of the advert and pay to have them publically executed, then pay the fines and court fees to publically show why it was justifiable.
They don't moderate these things because they have been facilitating it.
Yeah there's a huge difference between "they can't afford a proportionate number of moderators" and "firing the existing moderators is acceptable because they can't afford the appropriate number". Because at least the latter was a little water on the dumpster fire.
It does go to show that AI will performatively replace actual talent, though. The "it'll augment their effectiveness" people were wrong in the one case where you'd figure it would be a layup for increasing moderation quality and turnaround (and maybe even protecting the existing moderators from the mental harm that we all know Facebook is offloading onto public services and taxpayers, at best).