this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
1379 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86302 readers
3785 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
1379
The Backlash Is So Strong That People With “Pervert Glasses” Are Afraid to Use Them in Public (tech.yahoo.com)
submitted 21 hours ago by AlSweigart@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
368 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I don't see why smart glasses need a camera, especially an always-on camera. I have like 5 cameras in my pocket. Sufficiently advanced smart glasses should be able to just stream that data to the display. Hands-free camera? There is no shortage of clips, mounts and accessories to do that for you already, at 1/100th the price of smart glasses.

We want HUDs not hidden cameras.