Oh my goodness, it's my best friend in the whole wide thread! I have to apologize to you, I was just commenting on what I thought was someone else being ignorant but no, turns out you're the source of both! How funny is that? Well, to save us both some time I'll try to avoid bringing up the same points twice and then maybe throw in a link to the comment I just posted.

1-I'm only triggered in this case because you seem to be one of those people who believe in their own infalliblity above all else. Probably think your own shit smells like roses, etc etc. That attitude disgusts me and that's all I really care to say about it

2-I see, so not only do you claim to know how the entire world works in your other comment, but also in this one you say you were "around during the whole thing" as if you were physically in the various rooms where this whole story took place. Huh, that's a neat little detail and all... but how do you know I wasn't there too? That I was also "around during the whole thing" to the exact same extent as you were?

3-Just because the family didn't IMMEDIATELY come forward and present their view doesn't automatically disqualify it. Revising history is actually a healthy part of the process, etc. See link below for a better argument as to why "they could have come forward then but didn't" is not the strong closing argument you presumably think it is

4-https://lemmy.world/comment/24831324