this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
70 points (88.0% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

9258 readers
115 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m probably older than many here and have used messaging systems since UNIX “talk” and “write”. Commercial IMs such as icq, msn, yahoo, google chat, WhatsApp, signal. Federated and open systems such as irc and Jabber.

I have tried to jump into Matrix, but it is terrible. The resource usage is crazy, the user experience (even for an expert like myself) is incredibly bad, I lose messages, federation breaks all the time, and it doesn’t even bring anything new to the table regarding features! I cannot recommend it to anybody, not even my nerd friends!

Curious, I dived down into its specifications, and it is clear that the people who designed it didn’t learn anything from past systems. They just wanted to create a new and shiny messenger: “theirs” — cue in XKCD 927

I understand the push for a “modern” messaging system (xmpp is from the late 90s, during the hype of xml, etc) but Matrix, while “modern” in the sense of recent, is definitely worse than the previous alternatives. It is plain unusable. I wish I was wrong. I have used it for 3 years waiting for improvements but it is simply broken by design.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wrong community. That view is the majority view for everyone but the most die hard stans of Matrix.

And from a technical perspective the pseudo blockchain that is the foundation of the protocol is a terrible idea and should have never left the prototyping stage. But while their former bosses at Amdocs agreed and refused to further fund the project, the Matrix people got lots of crypto-currency funding during the height of that bubble to continue forward with this horrible idea.

Edit: the protocol might have some usecase as an email replacement in highly regulated government setting though.

[–] gkaklas@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

pseudo blockchain that is the foundation of the protocol

Can you please elaborate on that? 🤔

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The data model that the distributed database that forms the core of the Matrix protocol is using has many technical similarities to blockchains, just without the proof-of-work that Bitcoin etc added on top of the Merkle-tree.