this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
44 points (97.8% liked)

vegan

7025 readers
1 users here now

:vegan-liberation:

Welcome to /c/vegan and congratulations on your first steps toward overcoming liberalism and ascending to true leftist moral superiority.

Rules

Resources

Animal liberation and direct action

Read theory, libs

Vegan 101 & FAQs

If you have any great resources or theory you think belong in this sidebar, please message one of the comm's mods

Take B12. :vegan-edge:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The "let alone" part puts it as if liberating humans is more important than liberating non-human animals. The way I see this phrased used, it's usually that the first part is a necessary condition that the reader supposedly already agrees with, to showcase the validity of the more special case.

"They couldn't even walk let alone run", "She couldn't even buy food, much less rent", "This isn't true for any number, let alone even numbers" etc.

It places non-human animal liberation as a special case of the fight for the liberation of human workers. To be deferred to after a point in time when humans have been sufficiently liberated.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Yes, I do believe that giving people rights is a nessecary step before applying those rights to other animals. Not because those rights deserve to come first, but because of how modern government works. I (literally) don't have the ability to respect the rights of others if I myself don't have access to my rights, such as the ability to give a voice to those who don't.