this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
608 points (96.8% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

3381 readers
1283 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But this closes the hole that the images are of people who dont exist so they are ageless. Idk of anyone has challenged it with that strategy but I can see the supreme cunts ruling that since they are not real people its not CSM. I haven't read the bill but I hope this is the intention.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In your example it'd be CSM, just not CSAM I guess, technically. I think this is more about undressing real people though

[–] guy@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think one of the best arguments to ban AI child porn is because the models have to be trained on something, and that something would be of real children and therefore not a 'victimless' crime in that sense.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Seems fair. Is that really how the training works though? You'd hope they'd have a first-level filtering process that flags things before they get fed into the model but who knows.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

There's no way they had any sort of filtering. That would add way too much time and cost to the process of shoving in as much data as possible as fast as possible.