Okay, you're not required to snarkily broadcast that in the conversation, though. You could just ignore it.

Opinion pieces are chosen by the editors. They don't allow any opinions they don't want to make print.

I'm sure your aunt doesn't mean any harm, but she is still part of the problem. Those 3-5 properties are 3-5 fewer homes available to own for new families and are a small part of perpetuating the housing crisis.

The term football used to apply to any ball sport played on foot (as apposed to on horseback). The idea that it could only belong to soccer is actually quite arrogant.

Minor nitpick, juries only decide guilt; either guilty or not guilty. There is no way to legally declare someone innocent.

You sir, are entirely divorced from reality. It would be best for you to stop replying to the straw man you made up in your head and reconsider this entire exchange.

The old co-founder's threat still stands even with a new CEO.

That social agreement had been broken long ago by the elites like the one recently targeted. It's funny that only now when someone finally responds in kind that it is suddenly so important.

Mostly other CEOs and a lot of the media.

They likely didn't know how to save the file, so they took a picture of the screen.

Probably just a bunch of people getting in on the short.

The "replaceable CEO" is part of the reason the system is broken in the first place.