this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
19 points (95.2% liked)
chat
8637 readers
298 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
AI is, in theory, is much less problematic (mostly in terms of the fact that the financial incentives around lying about it's use cases disappears, reducing its overall usage, and that we wont have to deal with the issue of "IP for me but not for thee") much less of an issue under a socialist economy. Not unproblematic, but less society level catastrophy problematic. The output of the average number generator will be different if the averages fed to it are different.
However, I have never heard anyone who is serious about socialism say "everyone can have nuclear family under socialism" nor "you can just not work under socialism and stay in."
Again, who is saying this? Who are you talking to? Who are they citing to support such claims about the nature of socialism and revolutionary action? Are they just randos saying shit or do they actually have some level of organizational capacity to affect power?
I don't want to mention names because they're prominent media and intellectual figures, they're quite serious about socialism and you can infer these things by the way they talk and skirte around certain. For example when the topic of chronically ill people came up the person said 'a socialist society is a healthy society and one you should try to be as healthy as you can be to embody' and when the topic of marriage came up the person said 'the problem is under capitalism you can't really have a nuclear family on one income but under socialism it won't be a problem' like there's never a conversation about allowing chronically ill people to exist in public spaces as they are and not systemically baring them from public life and there's never a conversation about how why should law define relationship between two human beings in the first place? Like the fact their imagination never goes beyond 'yea this bad thing will be less bad under socialism' tells me everything about their project.
Sounds like streamer bullshit, but idk, I have never heard such rubbish at anything involving the PSL. Idk how you seriously call yourself a scientific socialist without at least challenging the idea of marriage as an extremely legitimate social relationship, it's one of the bases of Marx and Engels thoughts.
Trust me when I say these aren't opinions of a streamer but of people who you would think know better