this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
13 points (100.0% liked)

Language Learning

993 readers
17 users here now

A community all about learning languages!

Ask / talk about a specific language or language learning in general.

Sopuli's instance rules apply

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar whackos and no endorsement of them
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Other active Lemmy language communities:

Other communities outside Lemmy:

Community banner & icon credits:

Icon: The book cover of Babel (2022 novel by R. F. Kuang)

Banner: Epic of Gilgamesh tablet (© The Trustees of the British Museum)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
emb@lemmy.world
13
Anyone else learn languages by immediately getting a dictionary and grammar reference and trying to bang out sentences? (pawb.social)
submitted 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) by forestbeasts@pawb.social to c/languagelearning@sopuli.xyz
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It sounds like a lot of people just try to passively memorize vocabulary and read a bunch of stuff and whatnot?

I uh, haven't been doing that. >,,>

I picked up German and after doing a few things of Nicos Weg, I was grabbing words off wiktionary, looking up grammar, and trying to say stuff. Oftentimes varying levels of hilariously wrong (shoutout to the time I said "ausm Artzt" and sounded like I'm a chest burster coming out of the doctor). It's super fun and I think personally way more engaging than just trying to memorize stuff without being able to use it. It also naturally exposes us to a bunch of random helpful semi-advanced grammar concepts, to be able to say things like "we really need to take a shower and we STILL haven't eaten anything".

Started picking up Chinese today and I'm doing the same thing: look up words, look up grammar, bang out sentences. It's definitely slower going than German though!

Yet everywhere I look (at least for Japanese stuff), I see "oh don't do output at first! you need to memorize a bunch of shit and be able to read things and THEN you can start talking". Surely we're not alone in how we learn though?

-- Frost

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] emb@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Like with many things, I think the most important part is that it's fun and motivating for you. If you find an approach you gel with that gets you to engage with the language, then good! There's no best or most efficient way for everybody, no use endlessly searching for that.

Input > Output makes sense on at some level tho, at least to me. To do output, you need to have a good feedback loop so you know if you're hilariously wrong. Without it, you run the risk of building bad habits that may be harder to correct later.

It's a bit of a swing back from traditional classroom setting learning, which are (more so) output and grammar early. Notably, those settings have teachers and classmates for feedback.

The Japanese community in particular is laregly self-learners I guess. And having lots of kanji to learn and words with often unguessable readings pushes a lot of folks there to perhaps over focus on memorization.

[–] forestbeasts@pawb.social 3 points 10 hours ago

Huhh! That makes total sense.

Yeah the way we're doing it you kinda need friends who know the language better than you do (ideally native). When we were starting German I got TONS of incredibly helpful feedback from our German now-ex, which unfortunately we don't get anymore, but we still have a couple friends who speak German and can correct me from time to time. And for Chinese we've got a couple friends who speak Chinese (one is native and has been being super helpful, one I'm pretty sure is a learner like us just farther along than we are). We don't have any Japanese friends and I bet that's why I kinda burnt out on it pretty early, no way to get feedback.

-- Frost