this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
540 points (96.6% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

3381 readers
1303 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I don’t know of a single person who would hear “child sexual abuse” and think it’s somehow harmless.

Irrelevant. The problem is emotional impact, not the literal meaning of the words.

Read Orwell's Politics and the English Language. I'm basically cribbing from him.

The point is not that anyone would think the label is describing something harmless. The point is that it strips words of their power. Orwell extended this to say that clear language produces clear thinking.

"Child sexual abuse material" vs "child porn."

"Age-restricted workforce implementation" vs "child labor."

"Involuntary sexual intercourse" vs "rape."

"Intentional cessation of third-party biological functions" vs "murder."

"The Twentieth Century European Jewry Demographic Crisis" vs "The Holocaust."

I can read the first version of each of those and understand their literal meaning just fine. But every syllable you add strips the power from the words. And much is lost as a consequence.

The point of communication is not only to impart the literal meaning of the words. It's also to communicate emotional impact. "CSAM" and "child porn" share the same literal meaning, but their emotional definition is entirely different. They describe the same thing, but they are not the same word.